Research

Featured research.

Analyses drawn from our own measurement program. Retailer identities are anonymized in public materials; clients see the named record.

Distribution

Where the next wave of grocery brands breaks in first

293 brands in our footprint qualify as emerging, and 58% have not reached a single conventional chain: emerging brands fill 5.4% of the specialty shelf against 2.3% of the mass shelf, and the independent aisle is where the next wave shows up months before the panels see it.

September 2026Read →
Shelf visibility

At eye level, one kombucha brand triples its shelf share

Measured in-store, eye level is distributed nothing like the shelf overall: some brands hold three times their footprint there, and some of the biggest assortments sit below it.

August 2026Read →
Price and promotion

The same product, priced 29% apart across town

Across 549 identical products stocked at three or more banners, the median price spread is 29%, a quarter spread by 50% or more, and zero price identically everywhere.

August 2026Read →
Category structure

New-wave brands price a tier above the classics

Scoring one city’s ice cream shelf by brand era and price tier: 37% of new-wave SKUs sit at premium or above, against 10% for heritage brands, and their better-for-you share runs four times higher.

August 2026Read →
Category structure

The functional-beverage cooler is a land war

Prebiotic sodas, kombuchas, adaptogen waters: the most fragmented door in grocery is also the fastest-moving. What facing-level measurement shows that scanner data cannot.

August 2026Read →
Price and promotion

One product, two prices: digital and physical disagree

The same item routinely carries a different price in the store than on the same banner’s digital shelf. The spread is measurable and directional.

August 2026Read →